Anton Matusevich vs Emilien Demanet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Effectiveness: In recent months, Demanet has secured 41.95% of points on their second serve, whereas Matusevich has marginally outperformed with 43.83%. Does this offer a hint of Matusevich having a slight edge in the match? Perhaps.
• Return Game Efficiency: Currently, Demanet has captured 45.38% of second serve return points, but Matusevich surpasses that at 45.92%. On first serve returns, however, Demanet achieves 34% compared to Matusevich’s 25.22%. Could this indicate a significant advantage for Demanet?
• Breakpoint Resilience: Under pressure, Demanet saves 48.34% of breakpoints, while Matusevich excels at 59.31%. This could be a crucial stat for those considering in-game betting.
• Overall Performance: Over the past year, Demanet has a winning rate of 57.81% in matches, whereas Matusevich stands higher with 65.12% wins. Does this reflect better overall form for Matusevich?
• Surface Proficiency: Demanet's strength lies on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Matusevich performs best on Indoor Hard at 66%. How does this affect their chances on various surfaces?
• Match Level and Success: Both players mainly compete in $10K Futures events, with Demanet winning 58.73% of matches and Matusevich 70.97%. Is the level of competition a decisive factor here?
• Quality of Opponents: Demanet's opponents have an average ranking of 403.67, while Matusevich faces slightly less challenging opponents with an average rank of 437.09.
• Deciding Set Prowess: If the match reaches a deciding set, might Matusevich's 85% success rate give him an upper hand over Demanet's 41%?
• Breakpoint Conversion: Recently, Demanet has capitalized on 36.87% of his breakpoint chances, with Matusevich slightly behind at 32.86%. Could this impact key moments during match play?

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

In upcoming matches, both Demanet and Matusevich demonstrate particular strengths and weaknesses that could steer the outcome. Matusevich shows promise in second serve performance and breakpoint resilience, often key areas that determine match results.

Conversely, Demanet displays reliable return capabilities, particularly against first serves, which may dictate the match flow against players with strong serves.

Matusevich's superior performance in deciding sets gives him a clear advantage if the match extends beyond two sets.

Considering all factors, Matusevich appears likely to triumph, leveraging his strengths in critical match aspects and experience in concluding sets effectively.